The Controversy of the "Double Truth"
Ibn Rushd held that philosophical reason and religious revelation are two different paths to the same truth, and this stance, after being transmitted to Europe in Latin translation, was pushed to an extreme by some European scholars into a "double truth" doctrine (that philosophy and theology may each reach mutually contradictory conclusions without affecting the other), an extremized reading that at last drew the critique of the Paris bishop’s condemnation of 1277 — though whether this radical stance was truly faithful to Ibn Rushd’s own meaning is debated among scholars.