🦉Thought & FaithPhilosophy
🏠 Home🌐 中文
PhilosophyAGORA
🔢

Bentham

Original nameJeremy Bentham

English Philosopher, Founder of Utilitarian Ethics

Those Who Reanswered "How Should We Live" · Modern & Contemporary Thinkers
UtilitarianismThe Greatest Happiness PrincipleLegal Reform

Who they are

Jeremy Bentham (1748–1832) was an English philosopher and jurist, founder of utilitarian ethics, who proposed "the greatest happiness of the greatest number" as the sole standard for judging whether any moral or legal institution is justified, holding that pleasure and pain are the only real drivers behind human behavior, and that the moral value of any act should be calculated and weighed by the net balance of pleasure and pain it produces (he even conceived a specific "felicific calculus," seeking to quantify and compare the intensity, duration, and certainty of the pleasure brought by different choices of action). He devoted his life to promoting pragmatic reform of English law and the prison system, opposing the tradition of legislating by pure reliance on abstract natural rights or religious dogma, and holding that all legal institutions should be tested by their actual effect in advancing the overall welfare of society — an important theoretical founder of English legal positivism and the social reform movement.

Primary sourcesBentham, An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation

Key stories

"The Greatest Happiness of the Greatest Number"

In An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation Bentham proposed that "nature has placed mankind under the governance of two sovereign masters, pain and pleasure… it is for them alone to point out what we ought to do," and that the moral value of all laws, institutions, and individual acts should be judged by the sole standard of whether they achieve "the greatest happiness of the greatest number" — this thoroughgoing utilitarian logic of calculation sought to provide an objective, quantifiable rational basis for ethical and legal judgment.

The "Auto-Icon" Arrangement After Death

In his lifetime Bentham made a will requiring that his body after death be made into an "auto-icon" (preserved, dressed in his own clothes, with a wax head in place of the real one), still displayed today in a case at University College London, where important meeting minutes are said to still list him symbolically as "present but not voting" — this rather bizarre posthumous arrangement itself embodies his consistent style of utter indifference to traditional religious funeral custom and insistence on the supremacy of practical reason.

Relationships

Disciple

Echoes today

Below are how modern works borrow or reinterpret this name or story — not the original material. The two differ, so keep them apart.

The Auto-IconThe "auto-icon" displayed at University College London is still one of the university’s most famous historical relics, and important meeting minutes are said to still list him symbolically as "present but not voting."

Appears in

Curiosity mailCurious about world civilization? Leave your email — we’ll tell you when there’s something worth a look.

Free · unsubscribe anytime · Privacy